Insights
Browse IP insights and practice updates
Latest Posts
Madrid Designations to China: CNIPA Appears to Stop Forwarding Key Notifications to Local Agents, Raising New Deadline Risks for Brand Owners
According to practice updates reported by JD Supra in February 2026 and echoed by Womble Bond Dickinson in March 2026, the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) appears to have changed how it serves certain notifications in Madrid designations to China. Rather than forwarding those notifications to the local Chinese trademark agent, CNIPA is said to be sending them directly to the representative recorded with WIPO, or in some cases to the holder itself. If this practice continues, many brand owners will need to rethink the assumption that their China agent will automatically receive and action every contentious notice.
The operational significance is immediate. In non-use cancellation, opposition, invalidation and similar proceedings, missing the first notice can quickly compress the time available for evidence collection, instructions and local filing. If the local China agent is no longer copied by default, applicants and portfolio managers may need to monitor paper mail sent to the WIPO-recorded address much more closely and preserve the envelope itself, because the date of postal receipt may become critical to calculating response deadlines.
China’s Patent Commercialization Bottleneck: Why 1.349 Million Dormant University Patents Matter Now
An article by CNIPA Commissioner Shen Changyu published in the 2026 Issue 6 of Qiushi puts a hard number on one of China’s longest-running innovation problems: more than 1.349 million existing patents held by universities and research institutions had not been effectively commercialized before a nationwide stocktaking and value assessment was carried out across more than 2,700 institutions. The article also sets that backlog against two powerful indicators of economic relevance. Patent-related technology contract turnover reached RMB 1.18 trillion in 2025, while the value added of China’s patent-intensive industries reached RMB 18.04 trillion in 2024, accounting for 13.38% of GDP.
The real significance of those figures is not simply that China has “many patents,” but that the next phase of IP policy is being forced to confront a more difficult question: which patents can actually move into products, supply chains, licensing programs and industrial investment. Shen identifies five recurring obstacles—patents that cannot be commercialized, are not worth commercializing, are too risky to commercialize, lack capable intermediaries, or face weak market conditions. Read together, they point to a structural diagnosis: the problem is no longer just output, but conversion.






