Jordan’s Cabinet has advanced amendments to the Investment Environment Regulation, with a clear focus on reducing procedural friction for foreign investors entering the market. The changes are expected to simplify business registration and improve the way related checks, including trade names and trademarks, are handled before or during registration. For companies planning a Jordanian entity or brand launch, the practical point is straightforward: name clearance and trademark registrability may need to be assessed earlier in the investment process.A separate but connected filing update is...

A development reported on 30 July 2026 indicates that Thailand’s Department of Intellectual Property (DIP) and Customs Department have completed a new digital upgrade to the country’s customs IP recordation framework. The shift is aimed less at conventional container inspections and more at postal parcels and express-delivery channels, with partial logistics-data alerts reportedly linked to platforms such as Lazada and Shopee and AI-assisted screening used to flag suspected counterfeit goods and pirated merchandise.The operational value of the upgrade will depend on the quality of...

Türkiye’s Patent and Trademark Office (TÜRKPATENT) launched the Hague System Promotion Project on 24 July 2026 to encourage domestic innovators and foreign applicants to make greater use of the international registration route for industrial designs. The initiative is intended to improve awareness of how a single Hague application can be used to seek protection in Türkiye and multiple overseas markets while simplifying parts of the filing and portfolio-management process.The project does not itself alter Türkiye’s substantive design protection rules, but it signals a stronger institutional...

Following the launch of the EU–Japan Intellectual Property Action on 27 April and the May renewal of the JPO–EUIPO memorandum on trade marks and designs, the Japan Patent Office has further clarified how the cooperation is expected to work in cross-border e-commerce cases. The emerging framework centres on faster exchanges of information about suspected trade mark and design infringements, allowing platforms, rights holders and competent authorities in both markets to align evidence and enforcement steps before sellers shift listings or inventory across borders.The mechanism will not...

CNIPA this week issued the Annual Work Guide for the Demonstration Programme on Building China into an IP Powerhouse (2026). The policy signal is fairly direct: assessment should move further towards patent quality and industrialisation, rather than simple filing-count targets. The guide calls for patent quality and patent commercialisation to be emphasised in project reviews, institutional evaluation, enterprise recognition and talent assessment, while avoiding the use of patent numbers as a stand-alone benchmark. For local authorities, parks, universities and demonstration enterprises,...

The African Intellectual Property Organisation (OAPI) has put forward a draft Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market and E-Commerce Platform Liability, according to the policy outline now under discussion. The proposal moves beyond conventional copyright administration and focuses on how online marketplaces and digital platforms should respond when infringing goods or unauthorised digital content circulate through their services.The draft would seek to harmonise the regulatory approach across OAPI member states and introduce a “Notice and Stay-down” obligation for platforms. If...

UKIPO’s updated April 2026 guidance on non-use revocation, read together with a growing line of Tribunal decisions, is making life harder for proprietors trying to defend registrations with thin evidence. Formally, the latest trade mark-related entry in the published Tribunal Practice Notice list is still TPN 1/2024 from July 2024. In practice, however, the evidential line on genuine use has become more exacting. Platform screenshots, scattered sales records and transaction traces that do not land clearly on UK consumers are becoming much less persuasive when standing on their own.This...

IPONZ and New Zealand’s Ministry of Business have now pushed trade mark infringement and digital platform governance into the same practical frame, and that matters for more than headline value. The key shift is not simply that platforms are mentioned more explicitly. It is that rights verification is being moved earlier in the enforcement chain. The new rapid protection mechanism for domestic and cross-border e-commerce platforms is designed to help platforms identify the rights basis faster, reduce hesitation after a complaint arrives, and move obviously high-risk listings, stores or...

A case brief circulated this week by the EUIPO’s anti-infringement centre suggests that the EU’s enforcement playbook is shifting earlier in the chain. According to the account, infringers were no longer relying on one fake sign used repeatedly. Instead, they used generative AI to produce thousands of text-and-image trade mark variants at speed, trying to slip past keyword-based filters before distributing goods across Europe through fragmented cross-border small parcels. The policy response was just as notable: EUIPO said it would flag unusually frequent trade mark variant filings with no...

IP Australia’s current trade mark practice makes one point much clearer than before: in a three-year non-use dispute, it is not enough for a brand to point to a product page that happened to be visible from Australia. The harder question is whether the page, payment flow, delivery settings and surrounding marketing actually show that Australian consumers were being targeted. For cross-border e-commerce sellers, that is not a minor evidentiary tweak. It changes what kinds of digital records are likely to matter when a registration is challenged.The point is not that online evidence suddenly...

On 19 June 2026, Mexico’s Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI) issued a practice-oriented guide on proving trade mark infringement and bad-faith filings involving virtual cross-border storefronts and e-commerce platforms. The document is aimed at a market problem that no longer looks like classic offline counterfeiting: anonymous sellers, shifting links, multi-platform migration and overseas operators trading through virtual shops that can disappear and reappear quickly. As Mexico moves toward the 22 July 2026 implementation milestone of its latest industrial property reform package,...

On 18 June 2026, the UK Intellectual Property Office published two design decisions worth reading together: O/0497/26 and O/0464/26. The first, a detergent capsule invalidity fight, shows how little mileage a design owner may get from leaning on colour or a slightly different outer outline when the informed user still sees the same overall visual impression. The second, involving house-shaped planters, moves in the other direction: the fact that both products draw on the image of a house was not enough to collapse them into the same design. Porch treatment, roof presentation, window and...

The 7th All Africa Intellectual Property Summit has been confirmed for 11-13 November 2026 in Nairobi, Kenya, under the theme “Mainstreaming Intellectual Property for Africa’s Trade, Industrial and Creative Economy Transformation.” The phrasing matters. It does not treat intellectual property as a narrow question of registration or enforcement. It places IP back inside trade strategy, industrial policy and the business logic of creative sectors.For companies watching Africa from the angles of brand building, licensing, content distribution, manufacturing partnerships or technology...

On 1–2 July 2026, the AfCFTA Digital Trade Forum in Lagos produced one of the week’s clearest implementation signals: the AfCFTA Secretariat signed a 20-year concession arrangement for the AfCFTA Customs Modernisation Project (ACMP), with an estimated investment of US$3.1 billion. Public descriptions of the project emphasise interoperable customs systems, non-intrusive inspection technology, integrated data centres and multilingual customs portals designed to cut clearance times and reduce regulatory fragmentation.For IP owners, the more important point sits one layer deeper. Border...

On 6 August 2026, Indonesia’s Directorate General of Intellectual Property (DGIP), following the 1 August fee increases and electronic-system update, issued supplementary internal reference criteria for trademark deletion cases before the Commercial Court. The guidance focuses on digital-only evidence in three-year non-use disputes. Foreign-language e-commerce screenshots, promotional material not localised for the Indonesian market, or records lacking genuine shipment, customs or tax documentation tied to Indonesian addresses may carry little or no weight as proof of local commercial...

Editor’s note (24 September 2026): as of publication we have not located an official announcement of the measures described below; this article is based on industry briefings and is subject to official confirmation. Spain’s Patent and Trademark Office (OEPM) introduced a fast-track mediation route on 5 August 2026 for disputes involving cross-border trademark squatting and e-commerce counterfeiting, embedding the mechanism in the trademark opposition process. Under the announced procedure, genuine brand owners—particularly overseas businesses facing pre-emptive Spanish filings by agents or...

Trademark operations in Gaza are beginning to restart after a prolonged disruption. An update published by regional IP practice CWB on 21 August 2026 reports that the Gaza Trademark Office issued an administrative decision on 10 August allowing pending trademark renewals to be filed, with the corresponding official fees paid, up to 11 September 2026 without additional late-renewal fees. Earlier practitioner notices in late July also indicated that core services including new applications, renewals, publication and recordal work had started to resume.For rights holders, the practical issue...

On 7 September 2026, IP Australia updated its trademark examination practice guidance to clarify how evidence of genuine commercial use should be assessed in non-use removal proceedings. For cross-border sellers, the practical message is that merely showing a mark on an international e-commerce platform or proving that a website was accessible from Australia may carry limited weight on its own. Evidence such as Australian-dollar pricing or payment, orders and shipping records to Australian addresses, and marketing directed specifically at Australian consumers is more likely to demonstrate a...

The trade mark priority examination page of Brazil's National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI), updated on 2 September, now carries an explicit warning: payment forms under GRU code 3020 for the "virtual marketplace platform" (plataforma de mercado virtual) category are no longer being issued, because the category's quota for the period from 1 September to 31 December has been used up. The category belongs to the INPI's pilot for priority trade mark examination on strategic and public-policy grounds and is aimed at applicants who need a registration in order...