Skip to main content

Copyright

AI platform copyright governance and safe harbour liability

USCO Puts AI Platform Liability Under DMCA Scrutiny

The U.S. Copyright Office has issued an interim assessment on digital platform copyright governance and AI infringement liability, placing social media services, content-sharing platforms and built-in generative AI tools within the same policy conversation. The report’s immediate focus is not whether AI-generated content is useful, but whether automated AI systems used for DMCA notice-and-takedown can deal fairly with mistaken removals, under-removal and counter-notice procedures.The more difficult issue is the platform’s changing role. The traditional safe-harbour model rests on a familiar...
UK trade mark digital transformation and AI copyright policy

UKIPO Puts Trade Mark Digital Services and AI Copyright into Delivery Mode

The UK Intellectual Property Office’s 2026–27 Corporate Plan places service transformation and AI copyright policy among its main delivery priorities. The official publication record shows that the plan was first published on 11 May 2026. With the patent side of One IPO moving into optimisation and legacy-system retirement, UKIPO plans to begin designing the trade mark service on the same shared technology base. It also acknowledges operational pressure: rising trade mark volumes have created backlogs in hearings and tribunals, while patent workloads remain affected by application growth...
Malaysia copyright reform affecting AI training and online platforms

Malaysia’s Copyright Reform Puts AI Training and Platforms on Notice

MyIPO opened a public consultation on 3 July 2026 on proposed amendments to Malaysia’s Copyright Act 1987, with comments due by 14 August. The package spans AI and text-and-data mining, digital enforcement and copyright commercialisation. Among the proposals are rules for the use of protected works in AI training; stronger safeguards for technological protection measures (TPMs) and rights management information (RMI); a tighter online service-provider safe harbour with a notice-and-takedown window that may be as short as 12 hours; dynamic injunctions capable of reaching mirror, clone and...
Copyright settlement pressure on Canadian AI cover and remix platforms

Canada Signals a Licensing-First Turn for AI Covers and Remix Platforms

Canada’s latest public signals on generative AI and copyright are no longer just about labelling synthetic content. The direction is broader: platforms are being pushed away from a pure notice-and-takedown posture and toward a framework built on prior authorisation, transparency and a more defensible approach to remuneration. Across the 2025 copyright consultation summary and the 2026 Canadian Heritage committee report, the same point keeps resurfacing: creators’ ability to consent, be credited and be paid cannot simply dissolve because AI systems scale faster than copyright administration...
Kenya's proposed unified intellectual property authority and regulatory reform

Kenya Moves to Consolidate IP Regulation Under a Single Authority

According to a 14 July 2026 report by Spoor & Fisher, the Kenya IP Authority Bill, 2026 has been introduced in the National Assembly. It proposes merging the Kenya Industrial Property Institute (KIPI), the Kenya Copyright Board (KECOBO) and the Anti-Counterfeit Authority (ACA) into a single Kenya Intellectual Property Authority (KIPA), bringing patents, trademarks, industrial designs, copyright and anti-counterfeiting functions under one institutional framework. The bill also addresses mandatory IP recordation for imports, definitions for AI-assisted and AI-generated inventions, and a...
East African legal reform affecting trade marks patents and digital copyright

East Africa Reworks IP Rules as Tanzania and Uganda Advance Major Reforms

By mid-July 2026, two significant intellectual property reforms in East Africa had moved into sharper focus. Tanzania’s Written Laws (Miscellaneous Amendments) Bill, 2026 remains under legislative consideration and proposes coordinated changes to the Trade and Service Marks Act and the Patents (Registration) Act. The draft would recognise ARIPO trade marks designating Tanzania, strengthen protection for well-known, collective and certification marks, extend the patent term from ten years to twenty years from filing, and reinforce the utility model framework. If adopted in its current...
Modular metal furniture structure in an applied art copyright dispute

CJEU Clarifies Copyright Test for Applied Art in USM Haller Case

On 4 December 2025, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled in Joined Cases C-580/23 and C-795/23 on the copyright standard for works of applied art. Case C-795/23 arose from the dispute between USM and Konektra over the USM Haller modular furniture system. The Court held that applied art is not subject to a higher originality threshold than other works: protection depends on whether the object reflects free and creative choices that express the author’s personality. Choices dictated by technical function, ergonomics, safety requirements or industry standards do not, by...
Malaysia creative economy value-chain data model for AI and copyright policy

Malaysia Tests a Full-Chain Data Model for the Creative Economy

Malaysia’s Intellectual Property Corporation (MyIPO) and the World Intellectual Property Organization have introduced the Creative Economy Data Model at a national CEDM forum. MyIPO Director General Yusnieza Syarmila Yusoff said the model is designed to measure the creative economy across its full value chain rather than relying only on output indicators such as revenue, jobs or exports. Its scope includes digital transformation, platform-based activity, emerging business models and the growing impact of artificial intelligence on copyright industries.The policy value of the model will...
Indonesia music copyright recordation and digital rights data management

Indonesia Sets Music Copyright Recordation Fees at Rp0 from 1 August

Under Government Regulation No. 30 of 2026, Indonesia will reduce the copyright recordation fee for songs and musical works to Rp0 from 1 August 2026. During a dedicated outreach session for musicians, DJKI Director General Hermansyah Siregar presented the measure as part of a broader policy to simplify copyright procedures, widen creator participation and strengthen the national data framework for music rights. The immediate benefit is practical: composers, producers and rights managers with large catalogues will face fewer cost barriers when recording multiple works.Zero fees, however,...
Vietnam IP commercialisation policy covering AI, data and finance

Vietnam Pushes IP Commercialisation into AI, Data and Finance

During the 68th WIPO Assemblies, Vietnam’s Minister of Science and Technology, Vu Hai Quan, described intellectual property as a cornerstone of the knowledge economy. Nguyen Hoang Giang, Deputy Director General of the Intellectual Property Office of Vietnam, added that the country is accelerating IP commercialisation and preparing a legislative plan for a new Copyright Law. Vietnam’s latest IP action plan also points to stronger enforcement, new rules for AI and data, shorter examination timelines and the use of IP assets as collateral for lending.The policy mix is broader than a...
Saudi copyright reform covering AI training and digital platform liability

Saudi Copyright Reform Rewrites AI Training and Platform Liability

Saudi Arabia’s new Copyright Law will take effect on 12 August 2026, replacing the 2003 framework. Approved by Royal Decree No. M/169 and published in the Official Gazette on 13 February 2026, the law introduces a closely watched exception allowing reproduction of lawfully published works for the development of artificial intelligence products and algorithms, provided the user has lawfully obtained the original and the copying remains limited to that purpose. The provision is not a blanket licence for web scraping or large-scale model training: use must still satisfy the law’s safeguards...

White House National AI Policy Framework Signals a New Copyright Balance for AI Training

On March 20, 2026, the White House released its National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence legislative recommendations, and the section on intellectual property immediately stood out. The document states that the Administration believes training AI models on copyrighted material does not violate U.S. copyright law, while also acknowledging contrary arguments and urging Congress not to interfere with the courts’ resolution of whether such training qualifies as fair use. The framework is notable not only for its pro-innovation tone, but also for the second track it opens. Rather...
Layered intellectual property protection for Saudi esports and gaming

Saudi Arabia Sets Out a Layered IP Framework for Esports

On 31 July 2026, the Saudi Authority for Intellectual Property (SAIP) issued a dedicated report on intellectual property protection for the esports and gaming sector, alongside the Esports World Cup in Riyadh. The report separates a game into distinct protectable assets: source code and underlying scripts may fall under copyright, user interfaces and character models may qualify for industrial design protection, interactive technologies and hardware innovations may support patent filings, while names, event identities and commercial signs remain within the trademark system. For creators,...
Digital intellectual property services in Qatar

Qatar Moves Copyright Recordals Further Online

Qatar’s Ministry of Commerce and Industry has launched five new intellectual-property e-services covering copyright and neighbouring-rights recordals, certificate issuance, amendments, assignments and official file enquiries. The update is practical rather than cosmetic: for creators, rights holders and IP agents, copyright-related filings can now be handled with a clearer digital trail, reducing reliance on paper submissions and fragmented follow-up.The copyright upgrade sits alongside Qatar’s recent implementation of the 13th edition of the Nice Classification, after which all 45 trade...
Sports broadcast piracy and domain blocking enforcement

Philippines Moves Faster Against Sports Broadcast Piracy

Following World IP Day on 26 April, the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines (IPOPHL) has formally released guidance on enforcement for sports event broadcasts and related merchandise. The practical point is clear: illegal live streaming is now being treated as a time-sensitive copyright enforcement problem, with right holders expected to use pre-filed information to seek temporary blocking of specific infringing domains.For sports brands and content distributors, the value lies less in a new slogan and more in timing. A pirated match stream can capture its audience within...
US copyright group registration rules for specialized news websites

US Copyright Office Expands GRNW Access for Specialized News Sites

The U.S. Copyright Office implemented its final GRNW rule on August 13, 2026, revising the definition of a qualifying “news website” for group registration of updates. The prior rule described eligible sites in terms broad enough to favor general-interest news outlets, including language suggesting coverage of all subjects rather than a limited field. The revised definition focuses instead on whether a website primarily provides written information about current events. In its final rule, the Office made clear that specialized publishers may qualify when they regularly report a range of...

European Parliament Backs Generative AI Copyright Resolution: EU Reach, Licensing Architecture and Press Compensation

On 10 March 2026, the European Parliament adopted a resolution on copyright and generative AI that sends a clear policy signal to the Commission and the market: if a generative AI service operates in or targets the EU, it should not be able to evade EU copyright rules simply because model training took place outside the Union. The resolution argues for a more enforceable connection between transparency duties, rightsholder reservations and practical enforcement, so that non-compliant providers do not gain a structural advantage over compliant competitors. What makes the text especially...
Public consultation on U.S. Copyright Office fee adjustments and future pricing models

U.S. Copyright Office Opens Comment Period on Fee Changes: Repricing Copyright Services Amid Inflation and System Modernization

On March 19, 2026, the U.S. Copyright Office announced in NewsNet that it would publish a proposed rule in the Federal Register to seek public comment on adjustments to its fee schedule. The proposed rule was published on March 20, 2026, and written comments are due by May 4, 2026, at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time. The notice launches a new round of public debate over the pricing of copyright registration, recordation, and related administrative services.This is not simply a routine pricing update. The Office explained that it reviews and updates fees every few years, with the last adjustment...
Boundary between reproduction and making available for user uploads on EU platforms

EU Platform Copyright Rules Move Again: Emiliou Says Uploads Also Involve Reproduction, But No Separate “Second Licence” Is Needed

On 26 March 2026, Advocate General Nicholas Emiliou delivered his Opinion in Case C-579/24 Austro-Mechana and AKM, adding an important new layer to the licensing architecture for online content-sharing service providers under the EU Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive. In his view, when users upload protected content to a platform, the process does not involve only an act of communication to the public or making available to the public; it also involves acts of reproduction in the form of digital copies made on the platform’s servers.The real significance of the Opinion,...
Sports-linked innovation and IP assets for the WIPO Global Awards

WIPO Global Awards 2026 Close on March 31: With the New Sports Prize, SMEs Need a Clearer Story About How IP Drives Growth

The application window for the WIPO Global Awards 2026 will close on March 31 at 23:59 Central European Time. The program is open to startups and SMEs from all 194 WIPO Member States, but the real test is not simply whether a business owns patents, trademarks, designs or copyrights. The stronger question is whether those rights have already been turned into something economically and socially legible: market entry, product differentiation, licensing leverage, investor credibility, operational scale, or measurable public impact. For innovative companies that already sit on a meaningful mix...