Skip to main content
Korean AI and data intellectual property resource hub

Korea Opens a Single Webpage for AI, Data and IP Issues

Korea’s Ministry of Intellectual Property (MOIP) has launched a consolidated “AI, Data and Intellectual Property” webpage on the Korea Institute of Intellectual Property (KIIP) website, bringing together research materials on the intersection of artificial intelligence, data and IP. The page is organised around four areas: AI technology and patent trends, AI and IP policy systems, data and IP, and AI-generated works and IP. In practical terms, it gives users one place to follow issues such as copyright in AI-generated outputs, inventorship and examination questions for AI-related...
Black-and-white scanned filings under tighter CIPC submission controls

CIPC Tightens E-Filing Rules and Makes Scan Errors Costly

CIPC’s latest filing notice turns what many teams used to treat as routine document handling into a hard front-end compliance issue. The message is not subtle: scanned documents must be black and white and legible; one application may not be split across multiple emails; files over 10MB will be rejected; only standard PDF and TIFF formats are accepted; and CIPC will not download applications or parts of applications from other sites such as Google.The practical impact is bigger than the technical wording suggests. This is not simply a cleaner-scanning campaign. It shifts risk to the moment...
Intellectual property pathways for AI-enabled health innovation

WIPO, WHO and ITU Map the IP Path for AI Health Innovation

The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) have jointly released AI-enabled Health Innovation and IP: From idea to impact. Developed under the Global Initiative on AI for Health, the publication is designed for innovators, start-ups, research institutions and partners seeking to move AI-based health technologies from early development to practical deployment. It covers patents, trade secrets, copyright and data protection, alongside licensing, collaboration, regulation, health-data governance...
Israeli IP deadlines and data compliance controls

Israel’s Deadline Relief Puts Data Compliance on the Same Agenda

Israel has recently updated the application of its Extension of Periods and Postponement of Deadlines Law in response to the regional situation, giving temporary breathing room for selected regulatory approvals and certain administrative time limits. For IP owners and representatives, the relief may help where filings, responses or supporting documents are affected by disrupted operations. It should not be treated as a blanket extension, however. The competent authority, including the Israel Patent Office in relevant matters, may still shorten or remove the relief depending on the facts of...
Regional innovation coordination and IP governance in Abidjan

At HIPOC in Abidjan, OAPI’s IP Offices Were Pushed Beyond Filing Logic

On June 4 and 5, OAPI brought its second Heads of Intellectual Property Offices Conference (HIPOC) to Abidjan, with WIPO Director General Daren Tang attending around a theme that sounds broad but is unusually revealing: intellectual property and youth entrepreneurship, and how to build an innovative and inclusive ecosystem. The difficult question is not whether IP matters to young businesses. It is whether IP offices can still operate on old administrative timing while startups iterate, pitch, license and launch across borders at far greater speed.OAPI is not starting from a weak...
Platform-side enforcement of AI training opt-out and data licensing

US Copyright Office pushes AI training transparency toward platform compliance

As of now, the U.S. Copyright Office is still publicly pointing to the May 2025 pre-publication version of Copyright and Artificial Intelligence, Part 3: Generative AI Training, not to a formally effective final AI-training rule. Even so, the policy debate has become much more operational over the past year. If commercial model training continues to rely on platform datasets, open-web scraping and third-party licensing, questions about data provenance, authorization chains and the execution of rightsholder opt-outs are no longer abstract talking points. They are turning into concrete...
CIPC case management portal replacing email submissions

CIPC Ends Email Filing and Makes CMS the Only Submission Route

South Africa’s Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC) has now shifted case-related filing onto its Case Management System (CMS). In Customer Notice 30 of 2026, after launching CMS on 27 March 2026, CIPC said that from 31 May 2026 the designated email addresses previously used for complaints, statutory submissions, service of legal documents and related correspondence were permanently decommissioned, and that those matters must now be filed through the CMS portal as the sole official channel.This is more than a housekeeping update. For teams that still run complaint handling...
AI training data compliance in Chinese patent examination

CNIPA Pulls Data Compliance Into AI Patent Examination

China’s revised Patent Examination Guidelines, effective from 1 January 2026, move legality review much closer to the centre of AI and big-data patent examination. CNIPA did two important things at once. It added an explicit Article 5(1) review standard for AI and big-data applications, and it also revised the examination baseline so that, where necessary, examiners may review the specification itself rather than looking only at the claims. That is a meaningful shift. Applications involving data collection, label management, rule setting or recommendation decisions are no longer judged only...
ARIPO digital system procurement linked to paperless IP procedures

ARIPO’s LMS tender closes as its paperless procedure shift enters a decisive phase

ARIPO’s closing of the qualification stage for its new Learning Management System on 26 June 2026 is more than a procurement update. Read against the organisation’s 2022-2026 Strategic Plan, it looks like a late-stage digital infrastructure move aimed at tightening the operational backbone behind filing, examination support, notifications and member-state coordination.For applicants and advisers, the practical question is not whether ARIPO will have another platform. It is whether the Office is moving further toward a workflow in which procedural control, document exchange and deadline...
Digital filing controls and shrinking walk-in access at South Africa’s CIPC

After 30 June, CIPC Pushes More IP Workflows into CMS

On 30 June, South Africa’s CIPC announced that its self-service centres in Pretoria, Johannesburg, Durban and Cape Town would be closed to the public for the day, citing precautionary measures linked to the planned March on March protest. Taken in isolation, that notice was not a formal permanent-closure statement. Read together with CIPC’s recent workflow changes, however, it points in a clearer direction: walk-in access is becoming less central just as case handling is being pushed more decisively into the Commission’s digital rails.The bigger shift is not simply that filing is moving...
AI health data governance and international patent strategy

New WIPO Guide Links AI Health Data Governance to Patent Strategy

This article updates our report of 19 July, “WIPO, WHO and ITU Map the IP Path for AI Health Innovation”. On July 9, 2026, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) released AI-enabled Health Innovation and Intellectual Property: From Idea to Impact. The guide brings IP strategy, commercialization, health-data governance and technical standards into one framework for AI-enabled healthcare projects. It treats training-data provenance, patient consent, cross-border transfers, open-source...
Digital format and deadline controls in African IP filing

African IP E-Filing Moves to Stricter Format and Deadline Controls

A review of filing practice at the end of July 2026 points to tighter digital controls across parts of Africa’s IP and corporate-registration infrastructure. South Africa’s Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC) requires scanned documents to be submitted in clear black-and-white format, while its case-management system has replaced email for certain complaints, statutory filings and service of legal documents. At ARIPO, the 2026 edition of the Banjul Protocol rules applies from 1 March: oppositions must be filed within three months of publication, that period is not...
Training-data compliance and whitelist rules in generative AI patent examination

CNIPA Links Generative AI Patent Review to Data Compliance

Editor’s note (24 September 2026): as of publication we have not located an official announcement of the measures described below; this article is based on industry briefings and is subject to official confirmation. On 29 July 2026, the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) issued supplementary examination guidance for large language models and generative AI inventions, formally bringing training-data compliance into the patent review process. Where an AI model has been pre-trained or fine-tuned on copyright-protected datasets, applicants are expected to include a...
CIPC eServices profile validation and unique contact detail controls

South Africa’s CIPC Blocks Reused Contact Details in eServices

On 25 August 2026, South Africa’s Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC) issued Notice No. 41 of 2026 confirming a new customer-profile validation control in its eServices environment. When a user creates or updates a customer profile, the system now checks whether the email address or mobile number is already linked to another CIPC customer. Duplicate contact details trigger an error and the user must provide details that are not associated with an existing profile. The change arrived as CIPC marked its 15th anniversary and reiterated its ambition to operate as a digitally...
Policy framework for developing and integrating intellectual property data resources in China

China Links IP Data Policy More Closely to the National Data Framework

Editor’s note (24 September 2026): as of publication we have not located an official announcement of the measures described below; this article is based on industry briefings and is subject to official confirmation. On 26 August 2026, the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) and the National Data Administration jointly issued the Opinions on Strengthening the Development and Utilisation of Intellectual Property Data Resources. The document places IP-related administrative data within a broader public-data governance framework and calls for a national IP data resource...
Cross-border recognition of data intellectual property certificates in ASEAN cooperation

China Tests Cross-Border Recognition for Data IP Certificates

Policy signals released around 2 September, ahead of the 15th China Intellectual Property Annual Conference, indicate that the China National Intellectual Property Administration is preparing to test cross-border recognition of data intellectual property registration certificates in selected free trade zones. The first pilots are expected to focus on links with ASEAN partners including Singapore and Malaysia. The move sits alongside China’s 15th Five-Year Plan for intellectual property, which calls for further exploration of rules for protecting data-related intellectual property, and would...
A whiteboard with five blank circular nodes joined by lines, one node covered by a shield shape, and on the desk in front a laptop with a blank screen beside a stack of folders, symbolising enterprises embedding intellectual property review into each business stage

CNIPA Expert Commentary on the 15th Five-Year Plan: Algorithm, AI-Generated Content, Data and Open-Source Rules Set as Enterprise IP Priorities

On 23 September the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) published, in its column on the 15th Five-Year Plan for Intellectual Property Protection and Utilisation, an expert commentary by Huang Can, professor at Zhejiang University's School of Management and director of the Zhejiang data intellectual property research base, titled Modernising Enterprise Intellectual Property Management Systems, which puts rule tracking in emerging fields and full-process compliance review at the centre of enterprise IP management. Citing the plan's language on improving...